<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ricing up Karmic Koala</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/</link>
	<description>Ubuntard.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 04:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-3969</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-3969</guid>
		<description>Oh dear, you are really desperate. 

I&#039;m wondering - why &#039;ubuntard&#039;, since &#039;bastard&#039; is much more precise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, you are really desperate. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering &#8211; why &#8216;ubuntard&#8217;, since &#8216;bastard&#8217; is much more precise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTecknology</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>MTecknology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>The thing that really sucks about this is that you could actually be a useful person. You&#039;re obviously intelligent. The problem is that you&#039;re an elitist prick.

I&#039;m an Ubuntu user and I could hardly call myself a retard. I&#039;ve lately been ricing my 10.04 installation (boot processes, kernel tweaking, etc.). And making it more secure.

I have a hunch you already know how to do a large majority of what I&#039;m already doing.

BTW: I actually do have a system that only has 8MB RAM and it runs perfectly well with Ubuntu 10.04 with a GUI and all my tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that really sucks about this is that you could actually be a useful person. You&#8217;re obviously intelligent. The problem is that you&#8217;re an elitist prick.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an Ubuntu user and I could hardly call myself a retard. I&#8217;ve lately been ricing my 10.04 installation (boot processes, kernel tweaking, etc.). And making it more secure.</p>
<p>I have a hunch you already know how to do a large majority of what I&#8217;m already doing.</p>
<p>BTW: I actually do have a system that only has 8MB RAM and it runs perfectly well with Ubuntu 10.04 with a GUI and all my tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You're NOT funny.</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>You're NOT funny.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>This is awesomely dangerous advice. Now I know which website I&#039;ll _not_ be recommending to my friends. I can&#039;t believe I started reading thinking this was a serious article. I only worry for the day when this website makes a frontpage on google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesomely dangerous advice. Now I know which website I&#8217;ll _not_ be recommending to my friends. I can&#8217;t believe I started reading thinking this was a serious article. I only worry for the day when this website makes a frontpage on google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noam Samuel</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-2217</link>
		<dc:creator>Noam Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-2217</guid>
		<description>Just wondering, aside from the sillified explanation, isn&#039;t mounting with noatime considered pretty decent advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering, aside from the sillified explanation, isn&#8217;t mounting with noatime considered pretty decent advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>Linux in 1989?? Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux in 1989?? Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austin</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>Maybe add a warning label to this post?

&quot;If you can’t rub two brain cells together and notice glaring factual errors like “/dev/lp: Line printers and vinyl records.” and the screenshot of BSD, you deserve the results of blindly running commands.&quot;

Most of the destructive commands are before the parts of very obvious satire. also the screenshot isn&#039;t that obvious. nobody deserves to be punished for innocent ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe add a warning label to this post?</p>
<p>&#8220;If you can’t rub two brain cells together and notice glaring factual errors like “/dev/lp: Line printers and vinyl records.” and the screenshot of BSD, you deserve the results of blindly running commands.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most of the destructive commands are before the parts of very obvious satire. also the screenshot isn&#8217;t that obvious. nobody deserves to be punished for innocent ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: col</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>col</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>You missed a trick: if you&#039;re going to go to all that effort upgrading your $PS1 to $PS3, why even bother loading X? In fact, just &quot;sudo apt-get remove xorg&quot; and you&#039;ll see whole orders of magnitude of improvement in boot time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed a trick: if you&#8217;re going to go to all that effort upgrading your $PS1 to $PS3, why even bother loading X? In fact, just &#8220;sudo apt-get remove xorg&#8221; and you&#8217;ll see whole orders of magnitude of improvement in boot time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobarnix</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>foobarnix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>Haha, the backlash at this is hilarious.

If you can&#039;t rub two brain cells together and notice glaring factual errors like &quot;/dev/lp: Line printers and vinyl records.&quot; and the screenshot of BSD, you deserve the results of blindly running commands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, the backlash at this is hilarious.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t rub two brain cells together and notice glaring factual errors like &#8220;/dev/lp: Line printers and vinyl records.&#8221; and the screenshot of BSD, you deserve the results of blindly running commands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leeees</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>leeees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure a similar post to ubuntuforums.org would have got you banned for violating:

don&#039;t post dangerous commands or instructions not even for fun - IT&#039;S NOT FUNNY.

I&#039;m a computer illiterate and only b/c someone who linked to this said it was satire did have an inkling you were making a joke.

@luser

You&#039;re probably right - let&#039;s make them destroy their computers, they&#039;re stupid, they deserve it. After all, they did it themselves we&#039;re not to blame.

Reminds of fun with the SET command in the good old dos days:

SET f=&quot;format c:&quot;
SET n=y
SET y=n

You know the joke succeeded when your friend, after distinctly saying &#039;no&#039; to 

&#039;Will now format c: [y/n]?&#039;

Is greeted with

&#039;c: successfully formatted&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure a similar post to ubuntuforums.org would have got you banned for violating:</p>
<p>don&#8217;t post dangerous commands or instructions not even for fun &#8211; IT&#8217;S NOT FUNNY.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a computer illiterate and only b/c someone who linked to this said it was satire did have an inkling you were making a joke.</p>
<p>@luser</p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably right &#8211; let&#8217;s make them destroy their computers, they&#8217;re stupid, they deserve it. After all, they did it themselves we&#8217;re not to blame.</p>
<p>Reminds of fun with the SET command in the good old dos days:</p>
<p>SET f=&#8221;format c:&#8221;<br />
SET n=y<br />
SET y=n</p>
<p>You know the joke succeeded when your friend, after distinctly saying &#8216;no&#8217; to </p>
<p>&#8216;Will now format c: [y/n]?&#8217;</p>
<p>Is greeted with</p>
<p>&#8216;c: successfully formatted&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sathiya</title>
		<link>http://ubuntard.com/2009/11/ricing-up-karmic-koala/comment-page-1/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>sathiya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubuntard.com/?p=198#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>Though i have lot of things to ask, the very first thing is: 

&quot;checking various locations for the Linux kernel executable delays the boot by several seconds.&quot;

-- How are ensuring that, this is searched for several seconds in each boot ?! Is there any proof in official websites ?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though i have lot of things to ask, the very first thing is: </p>
<p>&#8220;checking various locations for the Linux kernel executable delays the boot by several seconds.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; How are ensuring that, this is searched for several seconds in each boot ?! Is there any proof in official websites ?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
